![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: Mannerism
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 08/15/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0475 Friday, 15 August 2008 From: David Evett <d.evett@csuohio.edu> Date: Thursday, 14 Aug 2008 12:52:45 -0400 Subject: 19.0462 Intentions Reactions Comment: Re: SHK 19.0462 Intentions Reactions >Arnold Hauser classifies him convincingly as a Mannerist; others >say he has no mannerisms. So there is quite a lot to sort out. Felix de Villiers should understand that Mannerism, as an art historical term designating (a) a group of 16th- and early 17th-century painters, sculptors, and architects that included Michelangelo and El Greco, among many others or, as Hauser proposes, (b) a recurrent way of making art that also has 19th- and 20th- and presumably 21st-century practioners, as Hauser proposes, is not a matter of having mannerisms. Some, maybe most artists have distinctive ways of doing things -- mannerisms, if you will -- that among other things help the critic or appraiser or historian to identify a work as Pontormo's or Francis Bacon's even without the signature and authenticated provenance. The term began as an observation that in the work of some artists, the manner -- what de Villiers presumably means by Style -- seems to become an object in itself rather than a means for presenting or representing some subject. The topic would hence belong very comfortably in the discussion de Villiers proposes. The real usefulness of the style-content dichotomy is pretty widely challenged in post-modern theory, of course; but that could be one of the threads of the conversation. Hauser's is hardly the last word on the topic, by the way. David Evett _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||