![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: (An)imadversions
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 08/15/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0472 Friday, 15 August 2008 From: John Briggs <john.briggs4@ntlworld.com> Date: Wednesday, 13 Aug 2008 22:35:32 +0100 Subject: (An)imadversions I am becoming increasingly irritated (and I have probably said this before) by the presence in modernised texts of Shakespeare's plays of the non-existent and wholly invented pseudo-Shakespearean word "an" (meaning 'if'). This word was invented by editors to represent a no longer current sense of the word "and." This use of "an" had previously been banished from at least the later volumes of the Arden 2 series, only to return with a vengeance in the Arden 3 volumes - but the pass had already been sold by that arch-moderniser Stanley Wells in the Oxford Shakespeare. Was a coherent explanation ever given? John Briggs _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||