![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: The Real Shakespeare
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 07/03/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0381 Thursday, 3 July 2008 From: Anne Cuneo <annecuneo@iprolink.ch> Date: Monday, 30 Jun 2008 12:00:46 +0200 Subject: Re: SHAKSPER Digest - (#2008-71) The Real Shakespeare >I'm sorry no one is responding to this site about Eric Sams's _The Real >Shakespeare_, which I'm finding fascinating. I recommend it not only for study >but also for pleasure. Sams is so full of verve and passion. I think one has to >read it a bit at a time. I am sorry too that I didn't react publicly, because I was so taken by The Real Shakespeare that I wrote an enthusiastic personal message to Richard Sams. I should have written it for everyone, of course... I have been a Sams fan for years. The fancy interpretations of Shakespeare and his works have always puzzled me, and I have often thought they were nothing but a way to make oneself interesting at Shakespeare's expense - in a text I once wrote on the subject I compared them to flies in the fell of a large and generous bear. While I was writing my novel "Objets de Splendeur, Monsieur Shakespeare amoureux" in which I adopt A. L. Rowse's assumption that Emilia Bassano is the Dark Lady, I was impressed by the number of those interpretations. As I wasn't sure to be right, since the evidence about Emilia is strong but circumstantial, I made my story A NOVEL, researched to the hilt, but still a novel. I don't claim it to be THE TRUTH. Some people haven't got that kind of restraint. So, when in the middle of writing that novel, and while drowning in all kinds of interpretations on every detail of the story I wanted to tell, I hit upon Eric Sams' writings (The Real Shakespeare, his editions of Ironside and Edward III, articles), it was an illuminating turning point: I rewrote the whole thing. It was not only his view of Shakespeare that impressed me. It was his way of looking at things: he thought me a method. I have been using it ever since, including in my activity as a journalist (since that is how I make a living). And in The Real Shakespeare II "my" Eric Sams is still there, original, down to earth, entertaining, funny sometimes - absorbing from beginning to end. I downloaded the printable version, printed it. After reading it through and through (I couldn't stop), I still peruse a section here and there. >I recommend especially the chapter on The Personal Shakespeare, which is a real >tour de force. He finds a lot of references to Stratford and Warwickshire, which >should please Stratfordians. Yes, it is particularly interesting together with Shakespeare in Warkickshire (Mark Eccles), which already contradicted thoroughly the assertion that "we don't know anything about Shakespeare". Cheers, Anne Cuneo _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||