![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: SHAKSPER Roundtable: Shakespeare's Intentions
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 06/29/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0371 Sunday, 29 June 2008 From: Duncan Salkeld <D.Salkeld@chi.ac.uk> Date: Friday, 27 Jun 2008 11:11:06 +0000 (GMT) Subject: 19.0364 SHAKSPER Roundtable: Shakespeare's Intentions Comment: Re: SHK 19.0364 SHAKSPER Roundtable: Shakespeare's Intentions Hugh Grady raises a fascinating point - - the relationship of the 'aesthetic' to intentionality. But it's not so easy to see how a distinction between 'conventional' and 'aesthetic' language (if it can be drawn at all) ties in with an equivalent distinction between 'non-intended' and 'intended' language. As a side issue, I can see very good reasons for regarding genres as shared conventional literary modes with their own social purposes but also as exemplars of writerly intention. David Schalkwyk seems content to hold that intention may be 'indispensable' or 'inescapable' but ultimately doesn't matter. For him, you can drop talk of intention and just stick to the evidence. But since evidence must be evidence of something, and sometimes of intention or purpose, that is precisely what you have to address. I don't think the debate comes down to a loaded choice between Shakespeare the fixed intending genius in one corner and the changing world of performance in the other. Cary DiPietro gives a very honest assessment of the pedagogical issues intentionality raises, and sensibly recommends that consciousness merits a place in the discussion. In philosophy, as in literary criticism, intentionality raises tricky problems not easily resolved. I simply maintain that avoiding talk of authorial intention at all costs seems an odd and limiting way to go about Shakespeare studies. _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||