![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: XML (eXtensible Markup Language)
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 05/20/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0306 Tuesday, 20 May 2008 From: Hardy M. Cook <editor@shaksper.net> Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 Subject: XML (eXtensible Markup Language) In the previous digest -- SHK 19.0305 A Problem of Access -- Michael Best makes a plea for the use of XML (eXtensible Markup Language) as a means of responding to the "threat that future changes in technology will render earlier forms of electronic data" because XML is "a format that will be reliably modified to work on any future system." Michael then goes on by noting the following: "We use the standard XML (eXtensible Markup Language) because its structure includes information on what the encoding means as well as the encoding itself. In Gabriel Egan's phrase, the files are "self- descriptive." Thus, future computers and future software may need different instructions in order to display the texts correctly, but all that will need to be changed will be the process, not the basic texts themselves. Changing the process will of course cost money in programming time, so we will just have to put the same kind of effort into keeping the e-texts current as we do into keeping libraries at a constant temperature." Michael's observation raises a number of questions. I current use Office 2007, whose default standard is now a version of XML; however, I have set my option to save files in the Office 2003 standard for capability with other users (for example, I use "*.doc" rather than "*.docx). One of my reasons has to do with my experience with Microsoft's version of HTML. When I save a document using "Save as HTML" I generally have a great deal of extraneous code that Microsoft includes that I need to remove to have a clean HTML document. So my first question is do Office 2007's files in XML save to "a format that will be reliably modified to work on any future system"? In other words, is there the same problem with Microsoft's XML standard as there is with its HTML standard? My second question is to Michael: How are files for the Internet Shakespeare Editions encoded into XML? Are they encoded manually or do you use a program to perform the encoding? And if so, what is that program or what is the process? _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||