![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: Extant Copies of the Q1609 Sonnets
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 05/15/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0294 Thursday, 15 May 2008
[1] From: John Briggs <john.briggs4@ntlworld.com>
Date: Wednesday, 14 May 2008 17:59:17 +0100
Subj: Re: SHK 19.0285 Extant Copies of the Q1609 Sonnets
[2] From: Hardy M. Cook <editor@shaksper.net>
Date: Thursday, May 15, 2008
Subj: Re: SHK 19.0285 Extant Copies of the Q1609 Sonnets
[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Briggs <john.briggs4@ntlworld.com>
Date: Wednesday, 14 May 2008 17:59:17 +0100
Subject: 19.0285 Extant Copies of the Q1609 Sonnets
Comment: Re: SHK 19.0285 Extant Copies of the Q1609 Sonnets
William Sutton wrote:
>There are 13 extant copies of Q1609 sonnets.
>
>My question is have all of them been collated for variants?
No, and apparently for the very good reason that, according to Kerrigan,
only two substantive variants have ever been noticed: 'seife'/'selfe' at
47.10 [and I don't think I believe that one] and 'proface'/'prophane' at
89.11. The serious variant is on the title page, where two different
wholesalers are named: as this defeats the object of naming the
wholesaler, one wonders what Thomas Thorpe was playing at. Perhaps he
was trying to incentivise his wholesalers?
John Briggs
[2]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Hardy M. Cook <editor@shaksper.net>
Date: Thursday, May 15, 2008
Subject: 19.0285 Extant Copies of the Q1609 Sonnets
Comment: Re: SHK 19.0285 Extant Copies of the Q1609 Sonnets
I spent a few hours, exploring some of the books in my library and came
up with two relevant passages that I have reproduced below:
Welles and Taylor. _William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion_. New York:
Norton, 1997. (444)
THE Sonnets were entered in the Stationers' Register on 20 May 1609:
Tho. Thorpe Entrd for his copie vnder the
hande of mr Wilson & mr
Lownes Warden a Booke
called Shakespeares sonnette
The volume (Q; STC 22353) was printed for Thomas Thorpe by George Eld in
the same year. H. E. Rollins, who collated all thirteen extant copies of
Q (_Variorum_, ii. 5), discovered press variants in outer C, outer D,
inner and outer F, outer H, and inner I. A few further non-substantive
variants have been noted in the title-page by Randall McLeod ('A
Technique of Headline Analysis'), who has also privately communicated
another incidental variant in outer D (49.3). MacDonald P. Jackson has
shown that Q was probably set by two compositors who punctuated 'in very
different ways', so the punctuation cannot be regarded as Shakespeare's.
. . . In spite of a few cruxes, the Sonnets are not badly printed.
Rollins, Hyder Edward. _A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare: The
Sonnets_. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1944. (Volume 2, 5)
A number of small variations may be found among the thirteen extant
copies of Q. The catchword at F3 appears correctly as "Speake" only in
the Huntington-Steevens and Bodley-Malone copies, incorrectly as "The"
in all others. At 27.6 the British Museum-Bright copy has a semicolon,
not a comma, after "thee"; at 47.10 apparently the Rosenbach copy has
the spelling "selfe", all other copies "seife"; at 76.4, 8 the question
marks are not impressed in the Folger-Locker copy; at 89.11 the
Folger-Mildmay and the Elizabethan Club texts read "proface", while the
rest have "prophane"; the number of sonnet 116, elsewhere appearing as
119, is correct in the Bodley-Caldecott copy; at 150.6 the Trinity
College copy has a semicolon, not a comma, after "deeds." I have
observed no other variants. (In this quotation above, I used "" to
indicate italics. HMC)
_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>
DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||