![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: Meta-Comment on Intentions Roundtable
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 05/02/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0251 Friday, 2 May 2008 From: Hardy M. Cook <editor@shaksper.net> Date: Friday, May 02, 2008 Subject: Meta-Comment on Intentions Roundtable John Drakakis concludes his thoughtful contribution to the SHAKSPER Roundtable: Shakespeare's Intentions with the following paragraph: I have taxed patient readers with too long an introduction, but may I make one request: the previous "Roundtable" strands have petered off into obscurity simply because particular contributors used the opportunity to parade thoughtless prejudice. Perhaps on this occasion, we might pause to think about how we might take the debate forward without getting bogged down in entrenched positions. We have enough material within the Shakespeare oeuvre to provide us with a variety of examples that we can profitably discuss, and that may, I think, lead us to conclusions that we might not have expected when we started to think about this topic. As SHAKSPER's editor/moderator, I am moved to comment here. I developed the concept of the Roundtable format as a means of re-capturing some of the excitement of SHAKSPER's early days. At that time, virtually all of the members of SHAKSPER were academics for the simple reasons that in the early 1990s, for the most part, the majority of those who had access to the Internet were members of the military or members of the academy -- AOL, HOTMAIL, GMAIL, EARTHLINK, and such did not exist. During these early years, members of SHAKSPER were pioneers, adventurous spirits from the academy, who were creating an electronic alternative to Shakespeare Association of America seminars and departmental lounges, a place where the likeminded discussed their scholarship and ideas, shaping in the process the very medium used for that discourse. The Internet brought together academics from around the world: a Shakespearean in Malta no longer felt isolated from her colleagues in Europe or in the United States; scholars from small colleges in rural Kansas could exchange ideas with their colleagues from major research universities on the coasts or across "the pond"; graduate students and tenure-track assistant professors could hone their academic eye-teeth debating with eminent scholars; while those eminent scholars could test their latest theoretical creations, getting reactions from a broad spectrum of potential buyers of their next scholarly tome. Now, that I have waxed nostalgic, let me return to the matter at hand. I share John Drakakis's hope that in Roundtable 2 we will have profitable discussions of the topic rather than our being diverted into endless repetitions of the same-old, same-old culture wars confrontations that have characterized some of our efforts in the past to examine subjects of a theoretical nature. Hardy M. Cook Editor-Moderator of SHAKSPER Professor of English _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||