![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: Solid Flesh Once More
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 04/14/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0222 Monday, 14 April 2008 [Editor's Note: This thread has long passed its usefulness, and I am, therefore, closing it. I will entertain one more round of substantive contributions; otherwise, any further discussion should be continued off line. -Hardy] [1] From: Donald Bloom <dbloom@asms.net> Date: Friday, 11 Apr 2008 11:47:48 -0500 Subj: RE: SHK 19.0218 Solid Flesh Once More [2] From: Joseph Egert <tregej@yahoo.com> Date: Sunday, 13 Apr 2008 12:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Subj: Re: SHK 19.0218 Solid Flesh Once More [1]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Donald Bloom <dbloom@asms.net> Date: Friday, 11 Apr 2008 11:47:48 -0500 Subject: 19.0218 Solid Flesh Once More Comment: RE: SHK 19.0218 Solid Flesh Once More Steve Roth writes: "My point is that the play in fact only fully exists in my/your/our heads/minds." Where else could it possibly exist? don [2]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Joseph Egert <tregej@yahoo.com> Date: Sunday, 13 Apr 2008 12:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: 19.0218 Solid Flesh Once More Comment: Re: SHK 19.0218 Solid Flesh Once More David Bishop writes: "Joe Egert asks if being off the mark about the play means misinterpreting Shakespeare's intent. I think that's generally the point, although things intended unconsciously by the author and also unintended may be happening too...." But David, can anything be "intended unconsciously"? Puzzled, Joe Egert _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||