![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: Call for Volunteers for SHAKSPER Book Review Panel
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 02/11/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0086 Monday, 11 February 2008 From: Hardy M. Cook <editor@shaksper.net> Date: Monday, February 11, 2008 Subject: Call for Volunteers for SHAKSPER Book Review Panel Dear SHAKSPEReans, I composed a message about establishing a Book Review Feature the other day, but somehow I seem not to have sent it to listserv for distribution or I neglected to follow the security procedures. Now I will have to reproduce from a faulty, short-term memory what I wrote earlier. Here goes. In early September, I sent a message to the list inquiring about the possibility of establishing a Book Review Feature for SHAKSPER. The response to my inquiry was unanimously positive. Unfortunately, difficulties during the fall semester were responsible for my not being able to follow-up on the project. This spring semester I am on leave, so I hope that I will have more time, and I am consequently turning my attention back to the Book Review Feature. What follows is my September message: ***** Dear SHAKSPEReans, A few years ago, to avoid having postings of a commercial nature on SHAKSPER, I developed, with the assistance of members of the Advisory Board and of the list itself, guidelines about announcing book releases. These guidelines stipulate that members and interested parties may make announcements about publications so long as these announcements are primarily informational, emphasizing details about the work's content. Such announcements may include links to sites that are promotional, but the announcements themselves should not appear as such. I have found these guidelines helpful, and now I would like to call upon members to assist me again. Setting aside for a moment considerations about its success or failure, one reason I instituted the SHAKSPER Roundtable was as an effort to have SHAKSPER remain as a useful service to the Shakespearean academic community - to continue to evolve and not to ossify or stagnate. For similar reasons, I am considering adding a book-reviewing feature to SHAKSPER. Over the years, discussions of new publications in the field have been an important component of our exchanges on this list. I thought that it might be appropriate to be more intentional about this aspect of our discourse. One possibility might be to establish a small group of Book Review advisors, to whom I would forward requests that I receive to have a book reviewed or to generate a list of possible new publications to be reviewed for so-called "publication" on SHAKSPER. The members of this group would then make a request for reviewers and subsequently select someone to be awarded the task. The reviewer would then have time to read, consider, and write a thoughtful 500 to a 1000 word review for posting on the list and for archiving on a book review section of the web site. These reviews would then become the basis for further discussion threads about the work under consideration or its subject. We may even request from the publishers that a copy of the book to be reviewed be sent to the reviewer. These ideas are only some possibilities that have occurred to me and are not the product of deep reflection. As a next step, let me request your private reactions to and thoughts about the possibility of our initiating a new feature for SHAKSPER dedicated to book reviews of works in our areas of interest. Hardy M. Cook Editor ***** The next step is for request four to six volunteers who would agree to serve on the SHAKSPER Book Review Panel. My preference is that the members of this Panel be from academia, since the purpose of this feature is to enhance SHAKSPER's contribution to the academic community. I invite interested persons to send me an e-mail, and I will select members of the Panel from those who apply. As I see it, the four main functions of the SHAKSPER Book Review Panel are to generate a list of books for review, to announce on SHAKSPER a Call for Reviewers, to select reviewers from those who express an interest, and to advise me prior to distribution on SHAKSPER if a review appears to me to be of questionable merit. This process is important since it insures that the reviewers have been selected through a peer-reviewed process and that reviews prior to "publication" will, if necessary, have been vetted by professionals, in all conferring an academic legitimacy on the undertaking. Since I am painfully shy, my hope is that, at least, one of the members of the Panel will be outgoing enough to be willing to contact publishers to request review copies of the selected books. Once we are ready to get underway with this feature, I will also announce that SHAKSPER is accepting books for consideration for review. At some point, I still plan to incorporate SHAKSPER as a not-for-profit corporation so that I can accept contributions to cover any costs associated with this undertaking. Once a reviewer has been selected, that person will have three to six weeks to write a 750 to a 1,000 word review that will first be distributed to members of the list in a daily digest and then will be archived on the fileserver with a link to the Book Review page off the SHAKSPER homepage. As I wrote in September, "These reviews would then become the basis for further discussion threads about the work under consideration or its subject." Although I am requesting volunteers for the Panel to launch the SHAKSPER Book Review Feature, I still welcome any ideas that members might wish to pass on to me about this subject. Best wishes, Hardy M. Cook Editor _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||