![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: Untouchable Shakespeare
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 02/06/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0070 Wednesday, 6 February 2008 [1] From: Larry Weiss <larry@lweiss.net> Date: Monday, 04 Feb 2008 23:02:12 -0500 Subj: Re: SHK 19.0062 Untouchable Shakespeare [2] From: Phyllis Gorfain <Phyllis.Gorfain@oberlin.edu> Date: Tuesday, 05 Feb 2008 07:09:00 -0500 Subj: Re: SHK 19.0062 Untouchable Shakespeare [3] From: David Richman <dmr@cisunix.unh.edu> Date: Tuesday, 5 Feb 2008 09:32:21 -0500 Subj: Re: SHK 19.0062 Untouchable Shakespeare [1]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Larry Weiss <larry@lweiss.net> Date: Monday, 04 Feb 2008 23:02:12 -0500 Subject: 19.0062 Untouchable Shakespeare Comment: Re: SHK 19.0062 Untouchable Shakespeare I am not aware that there is a widespread idea that "to read, teach or perform the Merchant is an act of Anti-Semitism per se." The closest I have seen is a chapter in Ron Rosenbaum's book "The Shakespeare Wars," which takes issue with the modern tendency to prettify or justify Shylock. Rosenbaum thesis is that the play is unredeemably anti-Semitic and no sympathetic portrayal of Shylock can alter that. But even Rosenbaum does not argue that the play should not be read or taught, or even performed. On the contrary, he sums up his position by saying that "I don't believe that Merchant should be banned or never shown. I'm just not sure of the rationale for showing it rather than reading it." [2]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Phyllis Gorfain <Phyllis.Gorfain@oberlin.edu> Date: Tuesday, 05 Feb 2008 07:09:00 -0500 Subject: 19.0062 Untouchable Shakespeare Comment: Re: SHK 19.0062 Untouchable Shakespeare >....I'm trying to substantiate whether the pointed reaction >I have encountered from older Americans, that to read, >teach or perform the Merchant is an act of Anti-Semitism >per se., is either widespread or influencing curricula.... Carol, here are some references you might find helpful: Ralph Cohen, "Unpalability in the Web of The Merchant of Venice." The Upstart Crow 19 (1992): 2-10. Gayle Gaskill, "Making The Merchant of Venice Palatable for U.S. Audiences." The Merchant of Venice: New Critical Essays. Eds. John Mahon and Ellen Macleod Mahon. New York and London: Routledge, 2002. 375-86. Marion D. Perret. "Shakespeare and Anti-Semitism: Two Television Versions of The Merchant of Venice." Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature 16.1 (Winter-Spring 1983): 145-163. Gerald Hammond. "The Merchant of Venice and the Jewish Question." Studies in Language and Literature 8 (Dec. 1998): 1-21. Lisa Freinkel. "'The Merchant of Venice: 'Modern' anti-Semitism and the veil of allegory," Shakespeare and Modernity: early modern to millenium. Ed. Hugh Grady. London and NY: Routledge. 2000. 122-41. Charles Edelman. The Merchant of Venice. Shakespeare In Production. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Best, Phyllis Gorfain Oberlin College phyllis.gorfain@oberlin.edu [3]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: David Richman <dmr@cisunix.unh.edu> Date: Tuesday, 5 Feb 2008 09:32:21 -0500 Subject: 19.0062 Untouchable Shakespeare Comment: Re: SHK 19.0062 Untouchable Shakespeare I haven't encountered the "Don't teach or perform MV because it is anti-Semitic." Even those who believe the play to be anti-Semitic believe the play must be taught and performed so one can confront the anti-Semitism directly. It would be interesting to do a Lexis search on accounts of recent productions and how they have been received. The last time I did such searches, when I directed MV in 2001, I didn't find directives to avoid teaching or performing the play. I don't yet know if the situation has changed since 2001. David Richman _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||