![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2008: A Titus Tangent of Tone
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 02/01/08
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 19.0058 Friday, 1 February 2008 From: Sam Small <samsmall@globalnet.co.uk> Date: Friday, 1 Feb 2008 12:35:34 -0000 Subject: A Titus Tangent of Tone Off on a tangent from the current discussion of Titus leads me to ask this. Does Aaron have to be black? Of the versions I have seen the director slavishly casts the ebullient Aaron as black as treacle. Is this not masked racism? Did not the sight of a black face in Elizabethan times mean foreign? other-continental? alien? plainly, a threat? Far be it from me to be politically correct but didn't Shakespeare use the contemporary prejudice that the audience would have been smitten and lay it on with a trowel? Apart from the few lines (that could be altered/removed) that refer to Aaron's skin tone why couldn't a white man play the part? My point is - do we have to project Elizabethan racism on a modern, unsuspecting audience? Troubled. SAM SMALL PS No one is allowed to use the word "authentic" or any derivations thereof. _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||