![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2007: Shakespeare as Falstaff
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 12/11/07
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0827 Tuesday, 11 December 2007 [1] From: Paul E. Doniger <pdoniger@snet.net> Date: Saturday, 8 Dec 2007 18:08:43 -0800 (PST) Subj: Re: SHK 18.0817 Shakespeare as Falstaff [2] From: Steve Sohmer <DRSOHMER@aol.com> Date: Saturday, 8 Dec 2007 23:58:35 EST Subj: Re: SHK 18.0817 Shakespeare as Falstaff [1]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Paul E. Doniger <pdoniger@snet.net> Date: Saturday, 8 Dec 2007 18:08:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: 18.0817 Shakespeare as Falstaff Comment: Re: SHK 18.0817 Shakespeare as Falstaff John Briggs wrote: "A rather more cogent question would be to ask who played what in 'Twelfth Night' (1601/2)? I would say that whoever played Falstaff played Sir Toby - would anyone argue? But which role did Richard Burbage take? The other leading male roles are Malvolio and the Duke (probably in that order). (The play is remarkable for having three strong female roles.)" I think the Sir Toby/Falstaff issue is quite probably correct, but who was it? I believe tradition (well, Baldwin, at any rate), says that Burbage played Orsino. For some reason, Orsino was usually considered the male "lead," even though it is a rather small part (line-wise). The largest male role in terms of lines is Toby. The other large ones are Malvolio and Feste (who has more lines than Malvolio). In modern times, it seems that the leading actors have tended to want to play Malvolio. It would be interesting to discover why the interest has shifted from Orsino to Malvolio. Of course, the real central figure (if there is only one central figure in "12th Night") is Viola. Paul E. Doniger [2]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Steve Sohmer <DRSOHMER@aol.com> Date: Saturday, 8 Dec 2007 23:58:35 EST Subject: 18.0817 Shakespeare as Falstaff Comment: Re: SHK 18.0817 Shakespeare as Falstaff Dear Friends, I think it's pretty clear from the inside jokes that Shakespeare played Julius Caesar and Polonius. If I can ever get around to drawing a long breath and writing at length about HAM, I'm going to suggest that Shakespeare played both Polonius (Ophelia's dad) and Old Hamlet (Hamlet's dad). In general, my hunch is that Shakespeare took on those characters who have a literary (or narrative) bent. And that from 1600 forward he played a lot of dads. We like to think Shakespeare played Prospero and delivered his grand farewell. I wouldn't be surprised if he played Chorus and delivered the "this is not the man" epilogue in 2H4. I like to think he discharged the same duties in R&J and H5. It would have seemed to audiences "just right" if writer-Shakespeare (who wrote the play) engaged actor-Shakespeare to narrate it. Those of us who have worked in the entertainment business know that a performer's personal life can inform his/her roles for better or worse; audiences tend to migrate what they know about a performer's personal life into the characters he/she portrays. I remember working very hard on the promotion to launch NBC's television series of "Casablanca" starring David Soul. A few weeks before the series premiere, the tabloids were filled with stories about Soul abusing his wife. True or not, it was clear that female viewers wouldn't accept him as Rick, the gallant protector of Ilsa Lund, and the show was a flop. I once had the unenviable duty of explaining to Jane Fonda that her playing a 40 year-old virgin in "The Old Gringo" would overstretch an audience's capacity for the willing suspension of disbelief. By the time Shakespeare's company moved into the new Globe in 1599, his fame as a theatrical storyteller was well-established. And, given that the population of London was all of 200,000, he must have been a very familiar face around town. That's why the inside jokes in JC must have worked so well. If anyone believes this thesis might hold even a little water, they might like to speculate as to whether Shakespeare played other dads as well as characters with a literary (or narrative) bent, e.g. choruses, pedants, Jacques, etc. For myself, I think he would have found irresistible the part of Cinna, the poet murdered for his bad verses. Hope this helps. Steve _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||