![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2007: Problem Shrews
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 11/09/07
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0759 Friday, 9 November 2007 [1] From: Patty Winter <patty1@sonic.net> Date: Tuesday, 6 Nov 2007 21:10:50 -0800 Subj: Re: SHK 18.0731 Problem Shrews [2] From: Tom Rutter <T.Rutter@shu.ac.uk> Date: Wednesday, 7 Nov 2007 09:37:56 -0000 Subj: RE: SHK 18.0753 Problem Shrews [1]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Patty Winter <patty1@sonic.net> Date: Tuesday, 6 Nov 2007 21:10:50 -0800 Subject: 18.0731 Problem Shrews Comment: Re: SHK 18.0731 Problem Shrews Lysbeth Benkert-Rasmussen <benkertl@northern.edu> >The most masterful version of the play I have seen was staged by the >American Conservatory Theater of San Francisco in 1976 (now available on >DVD). ACT staged the play as a commedia dell'arte production that >heavily emphasized physical comedy. I thank Lysbeth for this recommendation, and would appreciate reviews from anyone who's watched the DVD of the ACT production. My local library doesn't have it, but if I read further positive comments about it, I may drop a hint to Santa Claus. :-) Patty [2]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tom Rutter <T.Rutter@shu.ac.uk> Date: Wednesday, 7 Nov 2007 09:37:56 -0000 Subject: 18.0753 Problem Shrews Comment: RE: SHK 18.0753 Problem Shrews Jack Heller asks about shrew-taming plays: it might be worth looking at the two parts of _The Honest Whore_ (the first Dekker and Middleton, the second Dekker alone), which explore the viability of extreme patience as taming method. Tom Rutter Sheffield Hallam University _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||