![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2007: Presentism
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@SHAKSPER.NET) Date: 11/09/07
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0757 Friday, 9 November 2007 From: John Drakakis <john.drakakis@stir.ac.uk> Date: Wednesday, 7 Nov 2007 14:39:26 -0000 Subject: 18.0750 Presentism Comment: RE: SHK 18.0750 Presentism We seem to be regressing (again)! I don't know where you are getting your information from Joe but how 'Presentism' as a way of engaging both with the past and the present represents a 'knife aimed at the heart of scholarship as a cognitive enterprise' can be sustained as an intellectual position defeats any rational mind. Why it should then be likened to 'formalism' by R.A. Cantrell is also puzzling, since (even if it were true) as we all know from Roland Barthes a little formalism takes you away from history but a lot of it brings you back to history. Perhaps those who possess them could put their dictionaries of sloganising aside, and maybe we could have an intelligent debate that would actually get us somewhere. Cheers, John Drakakis _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||