![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2007: SHAKSPER Roundtable Postmortem
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 05/08/07
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0323 Tuesday, 8 May 2007 From: Cary DiPietro <carydipietro@hotmail.com> Date: Monday, 30 Apr 2007 11:19:56 -0400 Subject: SHAKSPER Roundtable Postmortem In the final installment of the Presentism Roundtable, John Drakakis opines: >"I was a little disappointed in that the round-table never quite got down >to dealing with the conceptual framework of 'Presentism'... Nobody so far as >I recall, raised the question of writing history, and of writing different >kinds of history, or of dealing with the business of historiography and its >protocols... I raise this, because unless and until we engage with this >issue then 'Presentism' falls back into a domesticated version of the >Derridean preoccupation with the future." I'm not suggesting that I did a very good job there, but I did at least raise the issue of history as a narrative structure in one of the first of the Roundtable digests, precisely with a view to stimulating discussion about conceptual frameworks for Presentism: http://www.shaksper.net/archives/2007/0091.html The post was unnecessarily long, or perhaps it was the spectre of Jameson that scared him off. In any case, I would refer John to an article recently published in the journal _Shakespeare_ (3:1, March 2007) that offers a more cogent exploration of presentism and historical narrative precisely in this vein: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=g776352430~db=all Shameless self-promotion, I know, but topical nonetheless... Cary DiPietro _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||