![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2007: SHAKSPER Roundtable: Presentism
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 03/30/07
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0221 Friday, 30 March 2007 From: Hugh Grady <hughgrady@comcast.net> Date: Monday, 26 Mar 2007 19:33:33 -0400 Subject: SHAKSPER Roundtable: Presentism From: Hugh Grady <HughGrady@comcast.net> There was just one post to the Presentism Roundtable this week-a brief reply to David Lindley's reply to his earlier post by Ewan Fernie. This slow-down reinforces my view that it is time to end the Roundtable. Accordingly, I invite all who wish to register an opinion or point about Presentism and related issues to post it to SHAKSPER between now and Apr. 6. After a brief pause for the Annual Meeting of the Shakespeare Association of America from Apr. 4 through Apr. 7, we will post the last offerings sometime the week of Apr. 9. Depending on the number of final posts, I will offer some valedictory remarks on the conclusions and lessons to be gained from this first attempt at a Shaksper Roundtable, either at that time or the following week. Best wishes, Hugh Grady From: Hardy M. Cook <editor@shaksper.net> For me at least this Roundtable has been an interesting activity, and before deciding on proceeding with another, clearly we should take the time to examine and discuss the "Presentism" experience, its successes and failures, as well as the benefits and shortcomings of having such a forum on SHAKSPER. In the meantime, please send in any final thoughts as Hugh Grady has invited. And those who will be attending the SAA in San Diego have a wonderful conference. I regret that circumstances are such that I will not be able to attend this year. Best wishes, Hardy From: Fernie Ewan <Ewan.Fernie@rhul.ac.uk> Of course David Lindley's right to emphasise that reading historical texts involves doing some history. I hadn't really meant to disagree with him in my first posting. Given his reply, I'd simply add that I believe too much history in recent academic criticism has seriously obscured literature-as-it's-experienced as an important territory of critical thought. And yes, that's a partly moral sentiment, as is Lindley's declared responsibility to the historicity of literature Ewan Fernie _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||