![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2007: Atone
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 02/12/07
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0131 Monday, 12 February 2007 [1] From: John D. Cox <cox@HOPE.EDU> Date: Friday, 9 Feb 2007 13:55:33 -0500 Subj: Atone [2] From: Norman D. Hinton <hinton@springnet1.com> Date: Friday, 09 Feb 2007 19:39:47 -0600 Subj: Re: SHK 18.0120 Atone [3] From: William L Davis <wld211@nyu.edu> Date: Saturday, 10 Feb 2007 09:57:12 -0500 Subj: RE: SHK 18.0120 Atone [1]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: John D. Cox <cox@HOPE.EDU> Date: Friday, 9 Feb 2007 13:55:33 -0500 Subject: Atone I'm not a historical linguist, but in response to Dennis Taylor's question about "atone," what I think happened is this. "Atone" was originally a common English verb that was pronounced "at one," and it meant what OED says, "to set at one." Tyndale chose this verb to describe the reconciliation of God and humankind in his translation of the New Testament. Eventually, the verb passed out of the language, along with its original pronunciation, so that only the biblical use of it remained as a specialized verb with an exclusively theological meaning and the current pronunciation, which masks the original meaning. In the estimation of critics as various as Patricia Parker and R. Chris Hassell, Shakespeare never uses "atone" in the theological sense, even in word play. He uses it only in the older sense, and he probably pronounced it "at one." John Cox Hope College [2]------------------------------------------------------------- From: Norman D. Hinton <hinton@springnet1.com> Date: Friday, 09 Feb 2007 19:39:47 -0600 Subject: 18.0120 Atone Comment: Re: SHK 18.0120 Atone The earliest use recorded in the Middle English Dictionary is from the romance _Bevis of Hamptoun_, >So şai atonede wiş oute sake. The derivation from the phrase 'at one' is fairly clear here. The date of Bevis is in the range ~1300 to ~1330 The phrase "at ones", in the sense "all at once" can be found in works dating around 1295 [3]------------------------------------------------------------- From: William L Davis <wld211@nyu.edu> Date: Saturday, 10 Feb 2007 09:57:12 -0500 Subject: 18.0120 Atone Comment: RE: SHK 18.0120 Atone The OED, while being a tremendous resource, is not infallible. Staff members on the project, along with hundreds of volunteer readers, combed through the resources of old books, personal letters and other documents to identify the earliest known usage of words. Without the benefit of modern resources or access to all the rare books available, however, entries were bound to fall short on occasion. I'm sure the people working on the first edition would have given their left arm to have a modern resource like the Chadwyck-Healey database to aid in the project (the first complete edition of the OED, I believe, spanned a time period from approximately the late 1850s to the late 1920s, or thereabouts). Simon Winchester has written a couple of insightful and entertaining books on the creation of the OED, and they give a lot of interesting background information into the whole project: "The Professor and the Madman," and "The Meaning of Everything." So, if you've found a word that is used in a way which appears to predate the OED's entry, you just might be correct in pushing back the usage to yet an earlier time. Best, William Davis _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||