![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2007: Apology and Roundtable Clarification
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 02/01/07
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 18.0068 Thursday, 1 February 2007 From: Hardy M. Cook <editor@shaksper.net> Date: Thursday, February 01, 2007 Subject: Apology/Explanation and Roundtable Clarification Dear SHAKSPERens, Let me apologize for (or rather explain) the recent, brief, unannounced hiatus. This is the first week of classes, and I previously was in denial about returning to work after the winter break. Anyway, I simply had pressing matters to deal with that were more important than editing SHAKSPER. But, then again, in the past three or four years, I have, thankfully, gotten less obsessive about the list than I had been formerly and now I simply miss days when my workload or health take precedence. My private correspondence, some people seem to be confused about Roundtable procedures. Of course, this is no wonder since we are beginning a new enterprise on SHAKSPER. Apparently, my use of the phrase "those of you who wish to participate in the Roundtable discussions" has caused some confusion. To begin, let me assure members that I have never contemplated not sending ALL SHAKSPER postings to All members of the list. My intention here, however, is to distinguish Roundtable discussions from the quotidian traffic on the list. One way that I plan to do this is to send out only ONE Roundtable digest per week (I'm planning on doing this on Tuesdays). After a Roundtable digest is distributed, those members who have an academic interest in the topic under discussion will reply. I will send those replies to the Guest Moderator, who will organize and comment on the responses and provide a brief summary of the week's exchanges. The Guest Moderator will then send all of this back to me, and I will organize and format the materials into the week's Roundtable digest, which will then be mailed to members I hope on Tuesday. I have no idea how well or poorly this plan will work, and I imagine that Hugh and I will modify it as we go along. Now back to the misunderstanding, the Roundtable concept came to me as yet another way to try to raise the level of discourse on the list. Because there is a Reading List and because the Roundtable subjects are selected from topics of current interest to the disciplines of Shakespeare or Early Modern Studies, my desire is that those who contribute to the discussions be knowledgeable, informed, and familiar with the issues involved. I am not looking for casual off-the-cuff remarks. Everyone will receive and be able to read and follow the Roundtable discussions, but participants are expected to have read from the selections on the Reading List and to be conversant with the parameters of the Roundtable topic. For the past year, I have been attempting to return SHAKSPER to its academic roots and, in this case, to provide scholars around the world with an alternative venue to conferences and publications to talk and to explore ideas. Hardy M. Cook Editor _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||