![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2006: Licensing and Public Domain
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 11/30/06
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.1066 Thursday, 30 November 2006 From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com> Date: Wednesday, 29 Nov 2006 17:16:27 +0000 Subject: 17.1061 Licensing and Public Domain Comment: Re: SHK 17.1061 Licensing and Public Domain Michael Best wrote: >There are, however, some arguments in favour of making scholarly texts >available in the public domain, and we will certainly be discussing these >alternatives as the site matures further. I understand the inherent tension between the effort in preparing the works on the one hand and making them available to the public domain on the other. You might want to consider one of the funding sources buying works into the public domain. Jimmy Wales announced the possibility of one just last month: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Copyright_wishlist http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2006-October/045481.html I'm not sure how this would interact with the ISE being a non-profit organisation, but I'd assume and hope that if one were to bill only for the time and expertise of the editors it would come within the non-profit realm. Note also that the digital scans of the quartos, first folio, and sonnets are already in the public domain in the United States, as far as I understand the following: "Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp., 36 F.Supp.2d 191 (S.D.N.Y. 1999), was a decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which ruled that exact photographic copies of public domain images could not be protected by copyright because the copies lack originality" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_Ltd._v._Corel_Corporation At any rate, as I mentioned in my previous message, even were the ISE original spelling works to be released to the public domain, I think it's both polite and good academic practice for people to clearly reference where they found them; especially given the amount and quality of the work that's obviously gone into them. Doing so would also avoid dissuading others from making similar items of historic value public domain works in the future, of course, so there are knock-on ramifications to such politeness. Kindest regards, Sean B. Palmer http://inamidst.com/sbp/ _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||