![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2006: Accent
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 04/03/06
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.0266 Monday, 3 April 2006 From: Jonathan Hope <jonathan.r.hope@strath.ac.uk> Date: Monday, 3 Apr 2006 13:55:30 +0100 Subject: 17.0255 Accent (Was Henry IV, Part 1 Query) Comment: Re: SHK 17.0255 Accent (Was Henry IV, Part 1 Query) Thomas Larque quite rightly focuses on Edgar in King Lear with regard to accent: >I wonder what part Edgar's transformation in "King Lear" might play in >informing this debate? Edgar clearly makes a shift in accents in order >to become a peasant, and then accidentally starts to shift back. His >father tells him "Methinks thy voice is alter'd; and thou speak'st / In >better phrase and matter than thou didst" and "Methinks you're better >spoken". When confronted by Oswald, Edgar goes into a special "peasant" >accent and what certainly seems like a regional dialect. I think it is interesting that Edgar's 'Poor Tom' persona does *not* have a transliterated accent. The persona seems to be marked by a shift into prose - when he slips back into verse it is this that his father notices (and the change in 'matter' - which I take to be content). With Oswald, Edgar uses a stereotyped stage peasant accent, which editors have tracked through various other plays, and which linguists have noted contains elements of Kentish (South East) and South Western dialects (in other words, it is a literary device which cannot be identified with any one region). I suspect that Shakespeare lifts the accent from a strikingly similar episode in Golding's Metamorphoses, where Mercury poses as a herdsman. Although the modern editions of King Lear I've looked at regularly reference other plays at this point in the text, I haven't so far found anyone linking Lear to the Golding. It's hard to believe that I'm the first person to have noticed this - does anyone know of an earlier report of this? Anyway, I think the 'Kentich' Edgar uses here is primarily marked for +rural (as linguists would have it) rather than -upper class. Of course, there are class implications, but I don't think they are meant to be as salient as the court/country, urban/rural opposition of Edgar/Oswald here. Jonathan Hope Strathclyde University, Glasgow _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||