![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2006: Arden3 Hamlet
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 03/01/06
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 17.0083 Wednesday, 1 March 2006 [1] From: David Levine <davidmlevine@worldnet.att.net> Date: Sunday, 26 Feb 2006 17:42:30 -0500 Subj: Re: SHK 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet [2] From: Thomas Pendleton <TPendleton@iona.edu> Date: Monday, 27 Feb 2006 14:17:57 -0500 Subj: RE: SHK 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet [1]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: David Levine <davidmlevine@worldnet.att.net> Date: Sunday, 26 Feb 2006 17:42:30 -0500 Subject: 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet Comment: Re: SHK 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet I don't know how everyone feels about this, but I am intending to boycott this Arden 3 edition of Hamlet whatever the price, since it strikes me as reflecting an utterly objectionable editorial policy. Harold Jenkins Arden 2 edition remains one of the best books I have ever owned; arguably the best example of a modern edition of a Shakespeare play. This new edition seems to reflect a general tendency on the part of editors to refuse to take any sort of real position on textual matters. Jenkins himself deplored the edition and said he was glad he would be dead when it came out. [2]------------------------------------------------------------- From: Thomas Pendleton <TPendleton@iona.edu> Date: Monday, 27 Feb 2006 14:17:57 -0500 Subject: 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet Comment: RE: SHK 17.0067 Arden3 Hamlet I very much share John Briggs' reaction to the forthcoming Arden 3 Hamlet. It seems to me almost perverse to operate from a position that effectively judges that there are three different plays called Hamlet and that the "real Hamlet" is Q2. I acknowledge, of course, that there is an argument to be made about the autonomy of each of the versions, but as Mr. Briggs makes clear, the effects of that editorial position can be-and it looks like will be-detrimental to making the play properly available to those who value it. The worst result is likely to be that this new Arden edition will eventually replace Harold Jenkins' magisterial Arden 2 edition, which is probably the closest we will ever get to an authoritative edition of Hamlet. I can't believe that a publisher who proposes to sell the second volume of Arden 3 for 55 pounds will recognize that Jenkins' Hamlet ought to be kept available simply for its excellence. Tom Pendleton _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||