![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2005: Claudius and Realpolitik
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 12/08/05
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.2024 Thursday, 8 December 2005 From: Stuart Manger <wizard@manger.demon.co.uk> Date: Thursday, 08 Dec 2005 00:44:04 +0000 Subject: 16.2019 Claudius and Realpolitik Comment: Re: SHK 16.2019 Claudius and Realpolitik Not sure I entirely agree with Abigail Quart: Machiavellian 'realpolitik'? Princes must rule, and I wonder if the lesson of so many Renaissance plays is that 'ruling' nearly always involves using state muscle, not asking too many awkward questions, not challenging the Prince too claustrophobically in his dealings? The safety of the state is important such that individuals within it might feel they can trust the Prince's governance. The problem comes in the grey areas when protecting the state oversteps moral or international law perhaps? Is that not what Claudius has done? Have we not been here before? Are we not indeed there now as Ms Rice globetrots to justify rendering extraordinarily [or not as the case may be]? By all accounts, Claudius seems a rather effective ruler - and that effectiveness may well be manifest in some pretty unpleasant dealings, but would I feel safer with Claudius ruling me than a man who thinks too precisely upon the event? If H would have proved royally, does that mean he would have been less decisive than Claudius but more moral? Or more the man who, as Ms Quart suggests, has had a pretty bloody hand in a number of extra-judicial killings? Tricky stuff. _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||