![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2005: Living Characters
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 11/30/05
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1976 Wednesday, 30 November 2005 [1] From: Philip Tomposki <philiptski@hotmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 29 Nov 2005 16:48:26 -0500 Subj: RE: Living Characters [2] From: Bill Arnold <barnold_pb@yahoo.com> Date: Tuesday, 29 Nov 2005 20:24:46 -0800 (PST) Subj: Re: SHK 16.1966 Living Characters [3] From: Duncan Salkeld <D.Salkeld@ucc.ac.uk> Date: Wednesday, 30 Nov 2005 12:03:43 +0000 (GMT) Subj: Re: SHK 16.1966 Living Characters [1]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Philip Tomposki <philiptski@hotmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 29 Nov 2005 16:48:26 -0500 Subject: RE: Living Characters From Joseph Egert: "Fine word "legitimate"! Let the Forum partake of Edmund's vigor and ingenuity. We need more upstart crows, not fewer. No more caged Ariels. Let the eagle soar!" More like turkeys, and there not soaring, their fluttering about making a great deal of fuss without achieving anything useful! I'm not a scholar, but I joint this list to read and engage in serious, thoughtful and informed discussions on Shakespeare. It's been distressing to find that of late, the lunatics have been taking over the asylum. There are plenty of lists where anyone can float all the kooky, nutty theories they want. If you think someone else wrote the canon, or that Shakespeare was a Jew, Italian, Ethiopian or alien life form, or have interpretations that has absolutely NO textural evidence, that's where you belong. Please leave this list to we old farts who actually believe in employing facts and reason in our discussions. Philip Tomposki [2]------------------------------------------------------------- From: Bill Arnold <barnold_pb@yahoo.com> Date: Tuesday, 29 Nov 2005 20:24:46 -0800 (PST) Subject: 16.1966 Living Characters Comment: Re: SHK 16.1966 Living Characters David Bishop writes, "The fact that Claudius is King Hamlet's brother intensifies the foulness of the murder, but what's sibling rivalry got to do with it?... As for how one brother 'persuaded his immature son into continuing the family battles', this begs a great many questions. Laertes, in some ways a mirror of Hamlet, needs no such persuasion because he believes it's a son's duty to revenge his father's death. As I've said elsewhere, I think the play's focus shifts, by the end, away from revenge toward justice." Ah, the *art* of Shakespeare! Leave it to a man of his genius to include foils and a comparative plot and comparative character to show the difference: Laertes is *only* interested in revenge, and Prince Hamlet is *truly* interested in justice. The text rules! Bill Arnold http://www.cwru.edu/affil/edis/scholars/arnold.htm [3]------------------------------------------------------------- From: Duncan Salkeld <D.Salkeld@ucc.ac.uk> Date: Wednesday, 30 Nov 2005 12:03:43 +0000 (GMT) Subject: 16.1966 Living Characters Comment: Re: SHK 16.1966 Living Characters Biblical names from the Old Testament become common during Elizabeth's reign - thanks to people reading those Protestant Bibles, of course. Other names such as Susanna and Judith had become popular earlier in the century - they are names familiar from the Mystery Plays, funnily enough. I think it is worth pointing out that the names Judith and Susanna were relatively rare in Elizabeth's reign (and Susan was a far more popular form than Susanna). Duncan Salkeld _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||