![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2005: Modern Bowdlerizations
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 11/29/05
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1963 Tuesday, 29 November 2005 From: Thomas Pendleton <TPendleton@iona.edu> Date: Monday, 28 Nov 2005 13:34:00 -0500 Subject: 16.1943 Modern Bowdlerizations Comment: RE: SHK 16.1943 Modern Bowdlerizations A fascinating thread, expectedly and especially so with Alan Dessen's contributions. I once saw Much Ado in a Broadway theater and waited in great expectation to learn if Derek Jacoby would announce that if he did not love Beatrice (Sinead Cusack?), he was a Jew to an audience of which a notable number would have themselves been Jews. He didn't; he was a knave. The opposite also interests me. Editors of Henry V now seem to like the opportunity to say "fuck" and "cunt" in their footnotes to 3.4. Gurr's revised Cambridge edition does; the revised Riverside doesn't; Bevington, seemingly hesitantly, supplies the latter, but not the former. More notable, perhaps, because it's actually the text, editors of Romeo now have Mercutio saying "O, Romeo that she were, O that she were/ An open-[arse], thou a pop'rin pear! (2.1.37-38). Obviously, I'm quoting Riverside; Bevington concurs. The Q2 reading is "open, or," and the other quartos and the Folio give "et cetera" in some form or other; snickering rather than blatant obscenity seems at least defensible to me. The moral: It's fun to be able to say dirty words with impunity. (As this post demonstrates.) Tom Pendleton _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||