![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2005: Commissioned Sonnets
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 11/25/05
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1948 Thursday, 25 November 2005 [1] From: Marvin Bennet Krims <marvin_krims@hms.harvard.edu> Date: Wednesday, 23 Nov 2005 09:42:26 -0500 Subj: RE: SHK 16.1925 Commissioned Sonnets [2] From: Bill Arnold <barnold_pb@yahoo.com> Date: Wednesday, 23 Nov 2005 06:52:37 -0800 (PST) Subj: Re: SHK 16.1925 Commissioned Sonnets [3] From: Stefan Andreas Sture <stefansture@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 24 Nov 2005 08:25:50 +0100 Subj: Re: SHK 16.1936 The Sonnets [4] From: Elliott Stone <elliott.stone@comcast.net> Date: Thursday, 24 Nov 2005 11:13:57 -0500 Subj: Re: SHK 16.1925 Commissioned Sonnets [1]----------------------------------------------------------------- From: Marvin Bennet Krims <marvin_krims@hms.harvard.edu> Date: Wednesday, 23 Nov 2005 09:42:26 -0500 Subject: 16.1925 Commissioned Sonnets Comment: RE: SHK 16.1925 Commissioned Sonnets From Meres' comment that they were meant for circulation among his "priuate friends" and the frequent use of the first person throughout, I would think the sonnets referred to Shakespeare himself. Marvin Krims [2]------------------------------------------------------------- From: Bill Arnold <barnold_pb@yahoo.com> Date: Wednesday, 23 Nov 2005 06:52:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: 16.1925 Commissioned Sonnets Comment: Re: SHK 16.1925 Commissioned Sonnets Thomas Jensen writes, "My wife and I are reading Helen Vendler's 1997 edition of the Sonnets. It seems everyone who approaches them, including Professor Vendler, infers some level of biography from them, (if only to the extent of the person or persons to which they are addressed.)" It is *more than* inference. The factual evidence is that Will Shakespeare refers to himself, "Will," in numerous sonnets: highly autobiographical, to say the least. Check Hardy's archives, as this is well discussed on SHAKSPER and in my 2002 book, Jesus: The Gospel According To Will. Bill Arnold http://www.cwru.edu/affil/edis/scholars/arnold.htm [3]------------------------------------------------------------- From: Stefan Andreas Sture <stefansture@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 24 Nov 2005 08:25:50 +0100 Subject: 16.1936 The Sonnets Comment: Re: SHK 16.1936 The Sonnets There's an excellent book on the sonnets by Paul Edmondson and Stanley Wells that discusses the sonnets and theater among other things. An essential read for anyone interested in the sonnets. Stefan Andreas Sture [4]------------------------------------------------------------- From: Elliott Stone <elliott.stone@comcast.net> Date: Thursday, 24 Nov 2005 11:13:57 -0500 Subject: 16.1925 Commissioned Sonnets Comment: Re: SHK 16.1925 Commissioned Sonnets It seems quite clear to me that Shakespeare believed that his plays were a commentary on the current events of his times. Prince Hamlet specifically makes this point. If we were to agree that in a like manner the sonnets were a commentary on the major events of the Elizabethan Court then all sorts of interesting and exciting possibilities would come to mind. 1.The major issue of the day would be the successor to the throne of Queen Elizabeth. The need of the Queen to marry and to have a child. Would the Tudor line continue? 2. The Essex Rebellion. 3. The struggle between the Catholics and the new Church of England. Professor Vendler chose not to examine these questions but that should not mean we should forgo these important lines of literary criticism. Best, Elliott H. Stone _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||