![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2005: "King Lear in a Box"
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 10/18/05
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1762 Tuesday, 18 October 2005 From: Nancy Charlton <pluscachange@comcast.net> Date: Monday, 17 Oct 2005 23:42:12 +0000 Subject: "King Lear in a Box" Monday 17 October Yesterday I was able to say, "A fortnight hence I will be giving the program I've been planning for months." However, today I'd have to say a it's a thirtnight, and tomorrow--well, you say it! The occasion on the 30th will have two parts. I'll have a very mixed general audience, more old than young, more town than gown. After a 70-minute talk by me on speech and poeisis and language, a pre-selected cast will do "King Lear in a Box," from a series published by Workman Publishing. Besides KL, they have Taming of a Shrew. The inro from the editor, actor and teacher Carl Martin, implies that he has done others but the haven't been published. (Richard Burt mentioned the KL on SHAKSPER in I think it was 2002.) The "box" includes complete text, 10 playing scripts, cards about each character (which I'll amplify a bit), and props: plastic eyeballs, a fool's cap, and a retractable knife. I may add some Halloweenish props, seeing as how it will be Samhain as well as Reformation Sunday. The idea is to play KL in about 40 minutes. Mr Martin has done a fine job of condensing the play. I'm going to restore Kent in the stocks, however, and also prolong the "war" scene. It won't be conventional fighting; I've seen in done with swords and with staves but I'm tapping three talented children (ages 10-13) of some friends plus one or three of their friends to conduct this fight in Tae Kwon Do. I may put back a speech or two as well. The place I'm using is really set up for concerts, replete with grand piano. However, the Classical Greek Theatre uses the space for its productions, and as an adaptable, minimalist space it works very well. Since I'll be using a large map of England in my talk, I'll leave it up, with the factions' HDQs plus Dover all marked, and the map scale prominently displayed. I think it is helpful in this play to give an idea of the distances covered. So, I'm wondering if any of you have done this 40-minute KL, ad I'd cherish your responses and ideas. Mr Martin suggests having Lear played with controlled rage rather than shouting, even at the elements. There is a fashion of having Goneril and Regan being deliberated provocative, wearing bondage outfits, body jewelry and tattoos. I think they should be more controlled. They are, after all, mature women, duchesses of no small social stature. Their come-ons to Edmund will be more effective for being subtle and tasteful; it makes their icy amorality and dissembling the more chilling. Cornwall in many is a far more thoroughgoing bastard than Edmund: at least we know what's driving Edmund. Albany is not a wimp or a coward, as Mr Martin's notes suggest, but at best a sincerely gentle man who just doesn't get it until too late. Mr Martin's edition has Albany speak the last four lines. I'll go with the more logical convention of having Edgar speak them, as Albany is clearly handing over the reins of state. Since I'm planning to encourage my audience to be like Globe groundlings and talk back to the actors, and because I'll do some speaking exercises with the whole audience beforehand, I think they will be ready to speak those four lines along with Edgar, and it should be a powerful moment. Those are my ideas that have evolved so far, on paper rather than on stage. Thanks in advance for your input. Nancy Charlton Portland OR _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||