![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2005: Less said the better, it seems
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 07/29/05
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.1262 Friday, 29 July 2005 From: Jack Heller <jackheller@kconline.com> Date: Thursday, 28 Jul 2005 09:39:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: 16.1254 Less said the better, it seems Comment: Re: SHK 16.1254 Less said the better, it seems I regret my comparison of two comedies to Romeo and Juliet (though R&J begins with a comic structure). I don't regret my larger point: There are a number of equally fine plays by Shakespeare's contemporaries that would bear favorable comparison to most of Shakespeare's plays. And some of these plays have an intertextual relationship with the plays of Shakespeare. Why not read Taming of the Shrew with The Roaring Girl and see if the latter is really any more frothy than the former. Or read The Changeling with any number of Shakespeare's tragedies. It isn't a lesser play. I suppose that I am guilty of circular reasoning or special pleading here. After all, there needs to be some basis for designations of "better," "worse," or "equal to." But I am influenced by those studies which show that Shakespeare's exalted status was not a given in his own lifetime, that he was made into the national poet. The unwashed masses distinctly loved A Game at Chess. The purveyors of taste found Titus Andronicus tawdry and of dubious value. Jack Heller _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||