![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2005: 'The World of Christopher Marlowe'
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 01/02/05
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 16.0005 Sunday, 2 January 2005 From: Richard Burt <rburt@english.ufl.edu> Date: Saturday, 1 Jan 2005 10:41:56 -0500 Subject: 'The World of Christopher Marlowe': A Brawler and a Spy http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/02/books/review/02SIMON.html?ex=1105591998&ei=1&en=ba350de925173fb3 'The World of Christopher Marlowe': A Brawler and a Spy January 2, 2005 By JOHN SIMON Pity the famous man born the same year as a more famous one: case in point Christopher Marlowe (1564-93) and William Shakespeare. At their simultaneous centenaries, Marlowe was shamefully shortchanged. It would be no less a shame if a recent popular biography of Shakespeare eclipsed David Riggs's worthy "World of Christopher Marlowe." Kit and Will are a pair of equal deservers. With praiseworthy modesty, Riggs calls his book "The World," not "The Life" of his elusive subject. Elizabethan poets (the word "playwright" was not yet invented) leave far fewer traces than biographers might wish for. This holds for Shakespeare as much as for Marlowe, though Marlowe benefited from being a brawler and a spy: there is nothing like getting in trouble for getting you into the record books. Christopher's father, a shoemaker in Canterbury, was the rare poor tradesman who was both literate and litigious. In his son, literacy was transmuted into literariness, litigiousness into falling afoul of the law. These were hard times, when hanging, beheading, even burning at the stake were often deemed insufficient punishment: the hanged man might be disemboweled while still alive; London Bridge was decorated with the heads of presumed traitors; and no one was safe, the male favorites of the Virgin Queen no more than the wives of her much-married father. The boy Christopher could watch from his window as prisoners were carted off to the gallows. At 8, he may well have been aware of the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre of Protestants across the Channel: several of his future plays contain massacres. Between 1547 and 1558, the English state religion changed three times, making Catholics and Protestants equal-opportunity victims. As for anyone suspected of atheism, the sin of sins, he would soon be racked with more than doubt, what with screws literally put on. From the tortured, confessions could be readily extorted, but were they true? When fellow playwright Thomas Kyd was hauled in for questioning about an allegedly antireligious book found in the lodgings he shared with Kit Marlowe-his roommate, bedmate and quite possibly sex-mate-Kyd ratted on Kit to save his own neck. Was Marlowe an atheist and a homosexual? The circumstantial evidence is compelling, but proof is lacking. [ . . . ] John Simon is the theater critic of New York magazine and the music critic of The New Leader. Three volumes of his collected theater, film and music criticism will be published in May. _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||