![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2004: Greenblatt on Hamnet & Hamlet
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 10/06/04
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.1835 Wednesday, 6 October 2004 From: Douglas Galbi <Douglas.Galbi@fcc.gov> Date: Tuesday, 5 Oct 2004 10:53:31 -0400 Subject: Re: Greenblatt on Hamnet & Hamlet That Hamnet and Hamlet represented the same name is an important and underappreciated fact. Another important and underappreciated fact is that Shakespeare's mother's mother was named Mary, his mother was named Mary, but none of his sisters were named Mary. Across sixteenth century England, veneration of images of Mary became a focus of intense controversy and dramatic public repressions, while the share of parents naming their daughter Mary rose sharply. For some discussion and analysis, see Section IV of "Sense in Communication" at www.galbithink.org For a large, machine readable database of names from the Guild of the Holy Cross, Stratford (entered 1406-1430 and 1490-1534) and from Stratford and Solihull (parish registers, 1539-1668), see http://www.galbithink.org/names/engb1800.htm ) Shakespeare was a brilliant writer. His work was primarily directed to the theatre. Mary, it seems to me, provides more insight into Shakespeare's choice of theatre and the creative power of his theatre than does Hamlet. Shakespeare scholars have written much about Hamlet, but little about Mary. Shakespeare scholars could bring more life to their discipline with more appreciation for the biographical and historical significance of Mary to Shakespeare. _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||