![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2004: A Computer That Has an Eye for Van Gogh
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 06/14/04
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.1253 Monday, 14 June 2004 From: Richard Burt <rburt@english.ufl.edu> Date: Sunday, 13 Jun 2004 19:35:56 -0400 Subject: A Computer That Has an Eye for Van Gogh This is far a field of the list's Shakespeare focus, but it may be of interest to members interested in attribution theory. A Computer That Has an Eye for Van Gogh June 13, 2004 By DOUGLAS HEINGARTNER AMSTERDAM WHO can say for sure that a great artwork is the real deal? It depends on whom you ask, and when: attributions of authorship often flip-flop from generation to generation, and a painting's journey from real to not real and back again can mean windfall profits for the lucky and despair for those who sell - or buy - too soon. Considering the sums at stake, you might think the business of art authentication would have long ago given way to modern technology. But so far, sophisticated techniques like spectrometry, DNA testing and pigment analysis have failed to supplant expert opinion. Now a team of researchers at the University of Maastricht, here in the Netherlands, are taking a stab at rationalizing connoisseurship, a word that in its art-historical context refers to the formal process of determining who created a work of art. They have developed a computer system that quickly examines hundreds of paintings for telltale patterns. The results, they say, can lend credence to existing attributions or help dismiss them. [ . . . ] http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/13/arts/design/13HEIN.html?ex=1088166866&ei=1&en=c879921b0aca53fe _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||