![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2004: Coriolanus 4.5
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 05/10/04
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.1033 Monday, 10 May 2004 From: Martin Steward <martinsteward@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: Friday, 7 May 2004 23:53:31 +0100 Subject: Coriolanus 4.5 Comment: SHK 15.1019 Coriolanus 4.5 "I'm not sure that Aufidius has abjured femininity; perhaps he has become feminine: 'cut i' th' middle.'" I like this suggestion. It made me wince a bit, though... "Professor Steward..." I am flattered by the implication (and pleased that Jack Heller found some of what I had to say stimulating), but I am merely on the brink of (finally) getting that elusive PhD, and now gainfully employed outside academia. "... gives source references for the material given above the passage quoted I've quoted (Leggatt, Kernan, and others). Please let us know if the remainder of your posting, on the servingmen, is your own because I would like to read further on them. I am most grateful." As far as one can ever make a claim on ideas, the rest, without references, is my own. Thinking back, I don't seem to recall any decent criticism on the Servingmen - but I wouldn't say my reading was exhaustive by any means. m _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||