![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2004: Stylometrics
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 04/12/04
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0851 Monday, 12 April 2004 From: Steve Roth <steve@steve-roth.com> Date: Wednesday, 7 Apr 2004 05:02:44 -0700 Subject: 15.0767 Stylometrics Comment: Re: SHK 15.0767 Stylometrics It's not only us soft-edged humanists who struggle with these difficulties. Vetting other people's algorithms--and their embodiment in some given computer language--is deucedly difficult: In Math, Computers Don't Lie. Or Do They? NYT, April 6 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/06/science/06MATH.html A leading mathematics journal has finally accepted that one of the longest-standing problems in the field - the most efficient way to pack oranges - has been conclusively solved. That is, if you believe a computer. The answer is what experts - and grocers - have long suspected: stacked as a pyramid.... ...For six years, mathematicians have pored over hundreds of pages of a paper by Dr. Thomas C. Hales, a professor of mathematics at the University of Pittsburgh. But Dr. Hales's proof of the problem, known as the Kepler Conjecture, hinges on a complex series of computer calculations, too many and too tedious for mathematicians reviewing his paper to check by hand.... Because of the ambiguities, the journal, the prestigious Annals of Mathematics, has decided to publish only the theoretical parts of the proof, which have been checked in the traditional manner. A more specialized journal, Discrete and Computational Geometry, will publish the computer sections.... Thanks, Steve (My algorithms, such as they are, are available for vetting at: <http://gabrielegan.com/shaxican/Roth's%20Refinements/index.htm>.) _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||