![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2004: Dancing in Shakespeare a bad idea?
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 03/18/04
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0726 Thursday, 18 March 2004 From: Al Magary <al@magary.com> Date: Wednesday, 17 Mar 2004 16:44:26 -0800 Subject: Dancing in Shakespeare a bad idea? A student reviewer at MIT had this comment about the Shakespeare Ensemble's production of Much Ado About Nothing: "Another thing that left me confused was the dancing. Dancing is a great way to pick up people at parties, but I hardly think it works in Shakespeare. It's like brain surgery: excessive wiggling can have disastrous results. At the end of the first act, I was left thinking, 'Now what in the world was that ten minute dance scene about?' I hardly think that a two and a half hour play needs a dance sequence, especially when the time spent practicing the dances could have been spent practicing some other important things." (http://www-tech.mit.edu/V124/N13/13_much_ado.13a.html) Now, this is an impatient comment by an amateur who probably needed to get back to the dorm to do problem sets. Nonetheless she found the dancing superfluous. I recall a rule for opera composers and producers in the 19th century: an opera--especially a French opera--had to have a ballet. It would seem as if pickup Shakespeare companies might be putting in dancing to try to gild the lily. Cheers, Al Magary _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||