![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2004: The Three Sons in Hamlet
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 03/18/04
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0721 Thursday, 18 March 2004 From: Edmund Taft <taft@marshall.edu> Date: Wednesday, 17 Mar 2004 11:18:04 -0500 Subject: The Three Sons in Hamlet I agree with Jay that control is a central issue in *Hamlet,* and I also think that Jay is right about Laertes's frame of mind when he first returns to Elsinore. About Fortinbras and Old Hamlet: 1. Fortinbras is a shadow figure whose motives can be seen as like or different from Hamlet's in much of the play. But there's one bit of evidence that suggests Fortinbras is also motivated by revenge: the opening scene of the play, in which Elsinore and all of Denmark fears an attack from Fortinbras. If all he wanted was his father's land, then he could recapture it without threatening the entire kingdom. He wants more than the land his father lost: he wants it all! Revenge is a dish which can taste best cold. In the end, he gets it all! 2. Old Hamlet's call for revenge is more problematic than Jay allows. Why not leave Claudius "to the will of heaven"? The Ghost does not seem to be able to foresee the future, but everybody in the audience knew that "revenge recoils on the revenger." The Ghost must know that too. He sacrifices his own son to get what he wants. I'd suggest that the older generation sees its children as property to do with what they want - and that includes Old Hamlet. As the play progresses, young Hamlet becomes more and more the instrument of Old Hamlet's will to effect revenge. The ethos of "people as property" finally wins out: Fortinbras gets it all. Ed _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||