![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2004: A Thought for St. David's Day
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 03/17/04
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0717 Tuesday, 16 March 2004 From: Peter Bridgman <peter@pfjb.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Wednesday, 17 Mar 2004 12:32:39 -0000 Subject: 15.0684 A Thought for St. David's Day Comment: Re: SHK 15.0684 A Thought for St. David's Day >If WS's purpose was to ridicule the historical Oldcastle as a Puritan >(and he may have done so), the effort fails rather notably, since >Falstaff is the antithesis of a Puritan. I agree, and realise my suggestion was something of a bald statement. There is no doubt that the young Shakespeare was biting his thumb at Puritans (enemies of theatre as well as Shakespeare's family's faith) when he chose to name his drunken bum after the Lollard martyr. But somewhere in the writing Shakespeare fell in love with his own creation. Oldcastle the Geneva Bible-quoting hypocrite became Falstaff the satirist and anti-hypocrite. In hindsight Shakespeare may well have thanked fortune that the name change was forced on him. It freed up the character, allowing him to become the nostalgic embodiment of Pre-reformation England. Peter Bridgman _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||