• Next message: Hardy M. Cook: "Wars of the Roses"
• Previous message: Hardy M. Cook: "Did Shakespearean Audiences Talk Back to the"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 15.0643  Thursday, 11 March 2004

[1]     From:   David Lindley <D.Lindley@leeds.ac.uk>
        Date:   Tuesday, 9 Mar 2004 14:22:28 -0000
        Subj:   RE: SHK 15.0639 1H4 and 2H4 Question...

[2]     From:   Richard Prince <Princeri@aol.com>
        Date:   Tuesday, 09 Mar 2004 15:22:02 -0500
        Subj:   Re: SHK 15.0625 1H4 and 2H4 Question...


[1]-----------------------------------------------------------------
From:           David Lindley <D.Lindley@leeds.ac.uk>
Date:           Tuesday, 9 Mar 2004 14:22:28 -0000
Subject: 15.0639 1H4 and 2H4 Question...
Comment:        RE: SHK 15.0639 1H4 and 2H4 Question...

Er, isn't 'The Wars of the Roses' a conflation of HVI, 1,2,3, and RIII
(it was when I saw it).

David Lindley

[2]-------------------------------------------------------------
From:           Richard Prince <Princeri@aol.com>
Date:           Tuesday, 09 Mar 2004 15:22:02 -0500
Subject: 15.0625 1H4 and 2H4 Question...
Comment:        Re: SHK 15.0625 1H4 and 2H4 Question...

David Bevington stitched to two together several years ago for a
production in Chicago. It was done witty his usual style and grace.

Richard Prince
English Department
Lewis University

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.

• Next message: Hardy M. Cook: "Wars of the Roses"
• Previous message: Hardy M. Cook: "Did Shakespearean Audiences Talk Back to the"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]