SHAKSPER 2003: Why List Moderation Is Good

From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net)
Date: 12/19/03


The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.2405  Friday, 19 December 2003

From:           Rolland Banker <rollbank@yahoo.com>
Date:           Thursday, 18 Dec 2003 18:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Subject: 14.2370 Why List Moderation Is Good
Comment:        RE: SHK 14.2370 Why List Moderation Is Good

Al Magary raises the topic of the moderator, I raise my glass in three
cheers for our Moderator and the Board.

Those of us unlettered autodidacts of the severe super-ego type will
naturally peruse this posting with trepidation; yet our boldfaced love
for the Bard urges and constrains us to contribute; even if sometimes
only the impassioned drive-by-type of posting that could be perceived as
chaotic immoderation.

Yet I hear Professor Cook in my mind's ear soothing and quoting Sonnet
35:

  NO more be grieved at that which thou hast done;
  Roses have thorns, and silver fountains mud,
  ....
  ....
  All men make faults, and even I in this,
  Authorizing thy trespass with compare,
  Myself corrupting salving thy amiss,
  Excusing thy sins more than they sins are:
  For to thy sensual fault I bring sense--
  Thy adverse party is thy advocate--
  ....

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.



about SHAKSPER | current postings | submitted papers | browse SHAKSPER | search SHAKSPER
 
Copyright © 2001, Hardy M. Cook, design by Eric Luhrs. All rights reserved.