![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2003: Why List Moderation Is Good
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 12/19/03
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.2405 Friday, 19 December 2003 From: Rolland Banker <rollbank@yahoo.com> Date: Thursday, 18 Dec 2003 18:05:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: 14.2370 Why List Moderation Is Good Comment: RE: SHK 14.2370 Why List Moderation Is Good Al Magary raises the topic of the moderator, I raise my glass in three cheers for our Moderator and the Board. Those of us unlettered autodidacts of the severe super-ego type will naturally peruse this posting with trepidation; yet our boldfaced love for the Bard urges and constrains us to contribute; even if sometimes only the impassioned drive-by-type of posting that could be perceived as chaotic immoderation. Yet I hear Professor Cook in my mind's ear soothing and quoting Sonnet 35: NO more be grieved at that which thou hast done; Roses have thorns, and silver fountains mud, .... .... All men make faults, and even I in this, Authorizing thy trespass with compare, Myself corrupting salving thy amiss, Excusing thy sins more than they sins are: For to thy sensual fault I bring sense-- Thy adverse party is thy advocate-- .... _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||