![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2003: "this vulgar noun"
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 04/28/03
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 14.0802 Monday, 28 April 2003 From: Erica Hateley <erica.hateley@arts.monash.edu.au> Date: Sunday, 27 Apr 2003 00:54:40 +1000 Subject: "this vulgar noun" A bizarre instance of Shakespeare as cultural authority showed up in today's edition of "The Weekend Australian" (April 26-27, 2003 p.R24): Luke Slattery, in a discussion of international classification decisions on Ken Loach's new film "Sweet Sixteen" moves - by way of Eric Partridge's "Shakespeare's Bawdy" & the Chatterley Trial - from Hamlet's "country matters" comment to a simultaneous justification of Loach's apparently frequent use of a "vulgar noun" in his film and to posit that "Obscenity lies right at the heart of the canon of great and morally improving literary works". That Slattery appears to have no 'issue' with the concept of "morally improving literary works" should indicate his position on the issue, but I thought it worth noting that "Hamlet" is yet again, albeit implicitly, used as the QED of any argument about cultural value and/or legitimacy. _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||