• Next message: Hardy M. Cook: "Re: Tolkien and Shakespeare"
• Previous message: Hardy M. Cook: "Honey Worm/Virus Follow-up"
• Maybe in reply to: Hardy M. Cook: "Shakespeare's Bible"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.2451  Friday, 20 December 2002

From:           R.A. Cantrell <racan@flash.net>
Date:           Thursday, 19 Dec 2002 08:06:08 -0600
Subject: 13.2444 Re: Shakespeare's Bible
Comment:        Re: SHK 13.2444 Re: Shakespeare's Bible

>I guess I wrote a poor sentence, because in my book I quote all 46
>names of the members of the committees from Westminster, Oxford and and
>Cambridge, then I quote and cite Miles Smith and Thomas Bilson, as well
>as Bishop Richard Bancroft and King James I, who actually worked on the
>KJV, making it a total of 50 known potential contributors.

My only points in writing were to exhort those who may not have read
Smith's "To The Reader" to read it, and perhaps to excite some curiosity
about Hugh Broughton.

All the best,
R.A. Cantrell
<racan@flash.net>

_______________________________________________________________
S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List
Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net
The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net>

DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the
opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the
editor assumes no responsibility for them.

• Next message: Hardy M. Cook: "Re: Tolkien and Shakespeare"
• Previous message: Hardy M. Cook: "Honey Worm/Virus Follow-up"
• Maybe in reply to: Hardy M. Cook: "Shakespeare's Bible"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]