![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2002: Re: "Introductions, Annotations, . . .
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 11/19/02
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.2292 Monday, 18 November 2002 From: David Evett <d.evett@csuohio.edu> Date: Wednesday, 13 Nov 2002 16:21:08 -0500 Subject: 13.2275 Re: "Introductions, Annotations, . . . Comment: Re: SHK 13.2275 Re: "Introductions, Annotations, . . . >In Ben >Jonson's day, as far as I know, only the Bible was likely to be >annotated in anything like a similar fashion. Thomas Larque narrows the field too far. There were annotated editions of Aristotle, Plato, Vergil, Horace, and the other most important ancient writers. Spenser had challenged comparison with them by issuing *The Shepheardes Calender* with a full scholarly apparatus, and Jonson himself, of course, did the same with his own Folio works of 1616. David Evett _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||