![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2002: Re: "Blackboard"- Enhanced Course
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 09/13/02
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1891 Friday, 13 September 2002 From: Alberto Cacicedo <alc@mac.com> Date: Thursday, 12 Sep 2002 11:13:36 -0400 Subject: 13.1887 Re: "Blackboard"- Enhanced Course Comment: Re: SHK 13.1887 Re: "Blackboard"- Enhanced Course I agree with David Lindley when he says that the >endless emphasis on assessment, marks, results is one of the things that >is stifling students of this generation (they can never believe that in >three years as an undergraduate in the late 60s I did not receive a >single 'grade' for any piece of work except the final examination). And >therefore in using my university's home-grown equivalent to Blackboard I >make a point of insisting that posts to the 'discussion rooms' are >absolutely not assessed, but simply a means of initiating argument >before a seminar and continuing it afterwards. But it's very hard to >get this through to students fearful of posting in case 'their' ideas >get 'stolen' by one of their peers for assessed work. Which is why I >insist that at least one posting is compulsory in the first two or three >weeks of a course - this works, and works quite well. It's persuading >them that there is intellectual benefit (rather than additional marks) >in continuing the discussion for themselves that is difficult, and I've >found only a minority of students ready to continue discussions under >their own steam. Unfortunately, my experience so far makes it so that my Panglossian moments are few. Alberto Cacicedo Albright College _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||