![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2002: Fact-event vs Pure-event
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 07/23/02
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.1682 Tuesday, 23 July 2002 From: Bob Rosen <Afterswift@aol.com> Date: Monday, 22 Jul 2002 15:10:17 EDT Subject: Fact-event vs Pure-event I recently attended a reception for a colleague at the University of Oregon (UO) to celebrate her marriage. That was a fact-event. As we entered the Alumni diningroom, we were handed a program. There was no deviation from the script. The only unknown was the parking space I would find. If someone stood on the banks of the Willamette River, which also curls past the UO, at that same moment with a fishing rod hoping to catch a salmon, I would describe that scene as a pure-event. Compared to the completely predictable doings at the reception, the fisherman had no idea of the outcome of his venture. Most of the events in our lives are fact-events. But the pivotal events historians must interpret are pure-events. Even new technologies are proven in pure-events. Oddly enough, the dynamics of pure-events often transcend contingency. I sometimes think, despite Shakespeare's intentions in Macbeth, that the cauldron in which the witches threw those disagreeable ingredients had a process of its own, which could have boiled up a fate for Macbeth that could have been at variance with how the play ended. Which explains why Macbeth was misled. Bob Rosen _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||