![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2002: "Oxford, Son of Queen Elizabeth"
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@shaksper.net) Date: 03/13/02
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.07394 Wednesday, 13 March 2002 From: Dave Kathman <djk1@ix.netcom.com> Date: Tuesday, 12 Mar 2002 16:33:12 -0500 Subject: "Oxford, Son of Queen Elizabeth" [Editor’s Note: Once more HE WHO SHALL NOT BE NAMED raises his head among postings to SHAKSPER; however, I am going to allow this question. My prohibition is against discussions of authorship, which I consider to be an issue not worthy of my time in editing posts about the subject into digests for the list – I already spend two to three and sometimes four hours a day doing this. An explanation is in order. however. Dave is requesting information about an e-mail spam. He asks that information about those who have received this spam be send to him privately and he indicates (and I agree) that the proper place to discuss, if one wishes to do so, the issues raised in this recent book is the humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare newsgroup (again, I agree). Yet I too must comment. I am (and I really do not know how to characterize myself without giving any credence whatsoever to those who believe otherwise), for lack of a better term, an ANTI-Anti-Stratfordian. I received one of the e-mails Dave mentions below. I did not read it carefully and deleted it within a matter of seconds after a very fast perusal. The message purported to be a newsletter that would arrive periodically to those people who wanted to know the real truth (sorry for the double redundancy). It then went on to the mention the book and its claims. I truly do not remember the offer for a free copy in return for a good review on Amazon. But I stopped deleted the message soon after reading the claims Dave cites. Again, responses to Dave, discussion to humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare, and any messages to me on this post will be deleted without being read. –Hardy] I'm sorry to venture into The Forbidden Topic, but I hope Hardy will indulge me if I keep this off-list after this initial post. An Oxfordian named Paul Streitz has written and self-published a book, "Oxford, Son of Queen Elizabeth I", in which he asserts, not only that the Earl of Oxford wrote Shakespeare's plays, but that Oxford was the son of Queen Elizabeth I and Thomas Seymour, and that Elizabeth secretly had at least five children (including the Earl of Essex, the Earl of Southampton, and Robert Cecil). While I have not read the book, it has been a topic of discussion on the humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare newsgroup, and from all accounts it is farcically bad even by Oxfordian standards, a source of virtually limitless comedy for anyone with even a nodding acquaintance with Tudor history and literature. I had heard, and read today on Wired news (http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,50971,00.html) that Mr. Streitz sent out a spam e-mail to 4000 English professors, offering them a free copy of the book if they would agree to post a review of it on Amazon.com. Apparently, at least three people took him up on his offer, but as of today, none of their reviews had appeared on Amazon -- the only two reviews there both give the book five stars (out of five) and praise it to the skies. Did anybody out there receive this e-mail from Paul Streitz? Did anybody respond to it? I'd be interested in hearing about (and preferably reading) any responses people may have sent. Please reply off-list to djk1@ix.netcom.com, because I know that Hardy doesn't want this kind of stuff cluttering up the list. Thanks, Dave Kathman djk1@ix.netcom.com _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@shaksper.net The S H A K S P E R Web Site <http://www.shaksper.net> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||