![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2002: Re: "the sunden stab"
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 01/15/02
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 13.0081 Tuesday, 15 January 2002 From: Martin Steward <MSteward@mds1974.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Monday, 14 Jan 2002 19:00:22 -0000 Subject: 13.0068 Re: "the sunden stab" Comment: Re: SHK 13.0068 Re: "the sunden stab" Thanks to those who replied on this subject. "Sudden stab" was the only thing I could come up with as well, but the RicIII reference swings the balance a little, as does Werner Broennimann's point about spellings such as "soudain". As it happens (or perhaps Werner has read the play and knows), the typesetter of "Law Trickes" repeatedly put "n" and "u" into the press upside-down, so this works very well as an explanation in context). I enjoyed Markus Marti's the most, though: "Maybe "n" and "d" were relatively similar in handwriting (= the usual expladatiod), but more probably the printer's just mane a little mistake". Or maybe the reader had a cold the day the typesetter was doing "Law-Trickes"!!! m _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@ws.bowiestate.edu The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||