![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2001: Dark Forces of Antagonism
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 12/20/01
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2872 Thursday, 20 December 2001 From: Sam Small <silverfox@silverfox.homechoice.co.uk> Date: Wednesday, 19 Dec 2001 21:40:08 -0000 Subject: 12.2863 Iago's Evil Comment: Re: SHK 12.2863 Iago's Evil Sophie's interesting contribution prodded me to write a thought I wanted to pass on the group anyway. After seeing the film "Dead Poets Society" (for the first time) brought to mind the nature of the "dark forces of antagonism" re-identified by Robert McKee in his terrific book "Story". He quotes that this aspect of story-writing fails prospective writers most often. In the aforementioned film the "dark forces", which are absolutely imperative in any story, are two dimensional conservatism in the shape of a grumpy headmaster and a slightly idiotic, overactive, pedantic parent. This is one of the reasons why "Dead Poets Society" is not great art and why "Othello" is. To know evil, its origins and its logic is a dark and terrifying path to take for any writer, but to do the job properly is quite necessary. The writer must become that awful character to know fully the world in which he resides. The writer must know the "evil one" as well as all the laudatory motives of the protagonist. It seems that Shakespeare was not afraid of this terrible walk in the dark. He jumped fully into this murky pit so that the audience has almost first hand knowledge of the brain of a madman. Iago is a good example of this. So is Aaron, Richard III and perhaps several others. If we are writers we must dig down for the times when we have hated without reason; when reason cannot stop the vision of the destruction of our foe. If we are honest we have felt this dreadful emotion, if only fleetingly. In Shakespeare this caustic emotion overwhelms the evil character who feels happy to justify his actions in any way he feels. Iago hated Othello. The reason, so Shakespeare seems to be saying, is unimportant. It could be the passing by of promotion; thwarted homosexual advances; colour prejudice - or a dozen others. What Shakespeare says clearly, however, is that the consequence of the maintenance of the hatred leads to destruction for all. SAM SMALL _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@ws.bowiestate.edu The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||