![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2001: Re: Subtext
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 12/14/01
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2847 Friday, 14 December 2001 From: W. L. Godshalk <godshawl@email.uc.edu> Date: Thursday, 13 Dec 2001 15:11:56 -0500 Subject: 12.2841 Re: Subtext Comment: Re: SHK 12.2841 Re: Subtext Martin Steward wants to know if Sean Lawrence and I have an intimate relationship. No, we don't. But Sean used the word "Other" without definition, and I misinterpreted deliberately his use of "Other" to mean "Rebecca," with whom I am intimate. It seems to me that this misinterpretation does not indicate an "interstice" in the text. It merely suggests that Martin was misled by me. I didn't give him enough information to make the correct assumption. Of course, even had I provided full information, he might still have believed that Sean and I are lovers (which we are not). Martin's reading/misreading of the text does not indicate that there is a "hole" (interstice) in the text. What I'm suggesting is that some of us are mislocating the sources of interpretation / misinterpretation. It is in ourselves that we must place the glory and the blame, dear Martin, not in an interstice. We auditors or readers must take the credit -- good or bad -- for our interpretations. Let's not blame our readings on the text. Any text can be misread, deconstructed, reconstructed, expanded, or ignored. Okay, all language is metaphoric, but let us not put all of our metaphors in one basket -- to be metaphoric. Lakoff and Johnson in Philosophy in the Flesh argue that most thoughts owe their fullness to metaphor. But when they get to their own disciplines, they begin to see that our use of metaphors can be misleading. Yours (not at all sceptically), Bill Godshalk P.S. My spell-check suggests "sceptic ally." _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@ws.bowiestate.edu The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||