![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2001: "The Sonnets"
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 12/13/01
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2834 Thursday, 13 December 2001 From: Douglas Chapman <Foodrev@aol.com> Date: Wednesday, 12 Dec 2001 11:38:10 EST Subject: "The Sonnets" Several months ago, I read about "The Sonnets," a novel by Lennard Davis on this site. I bought it and read it. It is an unusual work; though well-written and readable, it’s full of the odd assortment of characters any modern work is obliged to puppet. It includes all kinds of sexual ins and outs (please pardon the not very good pun) among staff, students and spouses. It includes a feminist so over the top that I felt cowed. So cowed that I desperately wanted some of my feminist friends to read it. Finally, one had the time; she agreed it was a nutty, not a feminist. For those who won't ever read it, here's my short comments. It is a short read. And I might add an easy read. “Will” teaches English, incl. Shak., at Columbia in NY. A seductive dark-haired grad student, Chantal, gets mixed up with him. Another “student” is the fair-haired Christopher. Well, you can get the idea. The book also has a recognizable “star writer” (the competition for affection) in the Dept. who does nothing but collect Macarthur grants and Nobels and Pulitzers and discard people like gin cards. A despoiler who gets all the glory (though he CAN write poetry) and does little thinking much less work. And is a user of people’s minds and bodies. He’s despicable. His fellow prof., Will, is married to “Anne” and has a daughter and a son. Will has an affair, bizarre though it be, with Chantal, his student, then with Christopher (his first male-male sex) after Norman (the “star writer”) has thrown him, Christopher, away. He loses Anne and the kids, he goes through all sorts of &*^%#@$%&^* including Chantal exposing their (consensual!) affair in the nastiest letter I’ve ever read. Manic-depressive Christopher moves in with him for an extended affair. Christopher’s sole purpose in life is to make an orrery the size of the apt. Blah, blah. Everyone ascends in success. Will keeps falling. Will then finds out that Chantal and Chris are, and have been, married. They did this mind stuff to him “for his own good.” Yeah, right. He ends up in Italy, alone, confused, broke, fired from Columbia and says he will start writing. Makes me glad I left teaching. While I miss the challenge of a good student, I do not miss the politics that becomes more important than learning and thought (admittedly, this in not an original thought). Years ago the old TV series “Police Story” (I think that’s the name) starring Karl Malden and a very young Michael Douglas aired an episode in which Maurice Evans played a teacher nearing retirement in a high school which over the years had become very inner city and uncontrollable. To make a long story short(er), Evans’ character kidnapped several students he thought could be “something better” and chained them to desks in an old abandoned school. The police eventually found them. And of course Evans DID break the law. He withheld bathroom privileges until a girl got her reading done and answered questions correctly and he did not let a boy eat until he had read Othello’s assigned speeches and came to the realization that he was not the only human in history to feel alienated. In this drama, he made a couple kids actually think. You could hear dedicated teachers within hearing distance cheering enthusiastically. “The Sonnets” does include all the major--and many minor--themes in the Shak. Sonnets. But it was, to me, full of contrivance and oddity carried to the absurd. Still, it’s readable. Douglas Chapman _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@ws.bowiestate.edu The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||