![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2001: Re: Lady Macbeth
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 12/13/01
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2832 Thursday, 13 December 2001 From: Tue Sørensen <tuesoe@s1.stud.ku.dk> Date: Wednesday, 12 Dec 2001 18:18:53 -0500 (EST) Subject: "Lady Macbeth"? > Actually, she is never referred to by the appellation Lady Macbeth. > Nor, I am told by Pamela Mason, do the early texts refer to her as Lady > Macbeth. There are three different variations of her designation as a > speech header. She is even called Macbeth's Lady but interestingly > enough never Lady Macbeth. It appears to be an early editor's > invention. Really? I have always liked the idea that Shakespeare had a specific reason for calling her Lady Macbeth, namely to show how Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are two sides of the same coin (reason and emotion, perhaps), and not distinct enough to have different names. Of course, I may have been assuming too much. Still, can we have some more detail on this? Which are the three speech headers? - Tue Sørensen _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@ws.bowiestate.edu The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||