![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2001: Re: Laertes
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 11/20/01
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2627 Tuesday, 20 November 2001 From: Mike Jensen <jensensh@hotmail.com> Date: Monday, 19 Nov 2001 08:11:12 -0800 Subject: 12.2619 Re: Laertes Comment: Re: SHK 12.2619 Re: Laertes Stephen, I wonder if you can remember any of J. M. Nosworthy's other reasons for suggesting that >the text of Hamlet betrays evidence of being specifically revised for a >tour which the company knew would include the university towns of Oxford >and Cambridge. In consequence the play adopts a positive, sometimes >flattering image of students and student life. My first thought when reading this was to see if all three versions of *Hamlet* have references to Wittenberg, and Hamlet calling Horatio his fellow student. All three do. References are from Bernice W. Kliman and Paul Bertram's ever useful *Three Text Hamlet,* New York: AMS Press, 1991. Wittenberg: Line 301 Student: Line 365 Am I wrong in thinking that for Nosworthy's suggestion to be correct, at least as I understood your retelling of it, that he would have to postulate a now lost 4th version of the play which has contaminated/influenced the other three? Possible, of course, but it seems needlessly complicated. Until I haue sounder proofs (Q1), and grounds more relatiue (Q2 & F), I'll be slow to accept this theory of the text. All the best, Mike Jensen _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@ws.bowiestate.edu The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||