![]() |
||||||
|
SHAKSPER 2001: Re: Richard II
From: Hardy M. Cook (editor@ws.bowiestate.edu) Date: 11/16/01
The Shakespeare Conference: SHK 12.2614 Friday, 16 November 2001 From: Bonnie Melchior <BonnieM@mail.uca.edu> Date: Thursday, 15 Nov 2001 11:27:42 -0600 Subject: 12.2608 Re: Richard II Comment: Re: SHK 12.2608 Re: Richard II Dan Smith writes that he finds intriguing "the difference between someone playing a role and someone who fills it." I, too, find that difference intriguing, and I think it is the root of the rabbit/duck criticism concerning *Henry V*: Is Henry filling the role of king or just playing it very well? That ambiguity seems built into the fabric of the play. Richard, on the other hand, is obviously "playing" the role, rather than filling it, and yet Richard is the one born to that role, "divinely appointed" to it-- a thought-provoking irony. Bonnie Melchior _______________________________________________________________ S H A K S P E R: The Global Shakespeare Discussion List Hardy M. Cook, editor@ws.bowiestate.edu The S H A K S P E R Webpage <http://ws.bowiestate.edu> DISCLAIMER: Although SHAKSPER is a moderated discussion list, the opinions expressed on it are the sole property of the poster, and the editor assumes no responsibility for them.
|
|
|||||